> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://coinmixer.gitbook.io/coinmixer-whitepaper/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://coinmixer.gitbook.io/coinmixer-whitepaper/product-guides/tokenomics.md).

# Tokenomics

Usefulness of the token

## Fund gathering

**Initial** funding for the mixer will be gathered from a **percentage** of token generated taxes on the first week of the token.\
\
This is **only needed once**, as the funds are then mixed and re-used, providing our functionality, which is why it is only done the first week. 

As our service does not waste but generates money, we can **guarantee** this **won't** be needed again for the **mixer** utility.

### Benefits of token-holding.

There are certain **benefits** to holding our token, which are better explained on the [***USE CASES***](/coinmixer-whitepaper/use-cases/dynamic-fees.md) section.\
\
Shortly put, **the two main benefits** are the ability to drop fees to **nothing but mixing gas**, which will be the **unchanged** norm for holders using our products, while the second benefit is for users to get a **share** of the generated **revenue** from our product.\
\
In order to be eligible for the aforementioned benefits, you need to hold at least **250.000 $CM** (0.025%) tokens.\
\
It's important to note that, there will be a premium tier with custom features, which only holders of **1.000.000 $CM** (0.1%) will be able to access. The **250k $CM** mentioned above are only used to verify for the initial version of the mixer, which is still untraceable and secure, however, it does **not** have all of the features.\
\
Nevertheless, every holder above **0.025%** will get a cut of the revenue.

### Potential of partnering.

When our mixer increases on **popularity**, we ***might*** offer our service as an API for a smaller fee than competitors. This will provide a **partnership** potential, however, this is an option that is **yet to be discussed**, so see this as a **possibility**, as we would much rather have a ***monopoly***.